Anti-Dumping Injury Inquiries

Decision Information

Decision Content

Expiry review RR‑2023-007

Carbon Steel Welded Pipe

Order and reasons issued
Wednesday, October 16, 2024

 


IN THE MATTER OF an expiry review, pursuant to subsection 76.03(1) of the Special Import Measures Act, of the finding made by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal on February 15, 2019, in inquiry NQ-2018-003, concerning:

CARBON STEEL WELDED PIPE ORIGINATING IN OR EXPORTED FROM THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKIYE (EXCLUDING THOSE GOODS EXPORTED BY ERBOSAN ERCIYAS BORU SANAYII VE TICARET A.S.) AND THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM

ORDER

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal, pursuant to subsection 76.03(1) of the Special Import Measures Act, has conducted an expiry review of the finding made on February 15, 2019, in inquiry NQ‑2018‑003, concerning the dumping of carbon steel welded pipe, commonly identified as standard pipe, in the nominal size range from ½ inch up to and including 6 inches (12.7 mm to 168.3 mm in outside diameter) inclusive, in various forms and finishes, usually supplied to meet ASTM A53, ASTM A135, ASTM A252, ASTM A589, ASTM A795, ASTM F1083 or Commercial Quality, or AWWA C200-97 or equivalent specifications, including water well casing, piling pipe, sprinkler pipe and fencing pipe, but excluding oil and gas line pipe made to API specifications exclusively, originating in or exported from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Türkiye (excluding those goods exported by Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayii ve Ticaret A.S.) and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Pursuant to paragraph 76.03(12)(b) of the Special Import Measures Act, the Tribunal continues its finding in respect of the aforementioned goods.

Susan D. Beaubien

Susan D. Beaubien
Presiding Member

Georges Bujold

Georges Bujold
Member

Serge Fréchette

Serge Fréchette
Member

The statement of reasons will be posted on the Tribunal’s website at a later date.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.